A legal expert report dismantles plagiarism and self-plagiarism allegations

 As part of the broader attempt to discredit Prof. Carla Rossi and her work on manuscript reconstruction, three publications were targeted with plagiarism-related accusations:

  1. 📘 The Book of Hours of Louis de Roucy – accused of copying a blog by Peter Kidd, despite being based on independent research and verifiable manuscript sources.

  2. 📙 Il Bronzino poeta – labelled as “self-plagiarism” for reusing content the author herself had developed and published.

  3. 📗 Sul confine italo-svizzero 1943–45 – challenged based on software similarity scores, with no contextual analysis or critical methodology.

These accusations have been officially refuted by a legal expert report, grounded in international copyright law and academic standards. The report shows that the claims lack merit and rely on a superficial or distorted understanding of intellectual property, research reuse, and scholarly authorship.

📖 A detailed presentation of the legal findings appears in the book The ReceptioGate Affair by Jordi Puig:
👉 Google Books – Preview

🔖 #ReceptioGate #CarlaRossi #PeterKidd #DeRoucyHours #manuscriptsprovenance #biblioclasm #culturalheritage

Popular posts from this blog

Peter Kidd's statements: Fact Checker

According to P. Kidd Prof. C. Rossi is not an art historian: HOAX

Institutional complicity: internal mailing lists used to spread defamatory content